Belcher Gastronomique

A cheerily unalphabetical dictionary of food terms

Quote of the day: Vaccines risk vs benefit

Some might wonder what relevance vaccines are to matters of food. One answer, of course, would be to say that all bodily organs and functions subtly interact in a manner that is often not sufficiently recognised by the medical authorities. Another is to point out the role vaccines, and immune adjuvants, may play in increasing the sensitivity of the immune system so that it responds more readily to antigens, such as food particles, sometimes (perhaps often) leading to food allergies. Other routes by which vaccines may interfere with the digestive system have been suggested and warrant further research. Unfortunately, as the quote below suggests, those individuals who plough a lone furrow by pursuing research subjects outside of the current paradigm – individuals who would be the very saviours of science if Karl Popper’s idealistic vision of falsifiable science were descriptive of science in practice rather than prescriptive of a science not warped by the profit motive and vested interests (of reputations, career progressions within existing theories etc.) – are vociferously attacked. In the case of Dr Andrew Wakefield one of the attackers was the Times newspaper, which is controlled by a man with shares in the company with a vested interest in destroying Dr Andrew Wakefield’s reputation, GlaxoSmithKline who make the MMR vaccine.

Vaccines are a mixed blessing. They can stimulate our immune system and generate an immunity to acute disease, but they can also overwhelm our immune system and generate a susceptibility to chronic disease. The question about vaccines is not whether they work; the question is whether the cure is worse than the disease. Are we better off with the artificial immunity that results from vaccines? Or are we better off with the natural immunity that results from the usual childhood diseases of measles, mumps, and chickenpox? Let’s re-visit this question in a calm, objective manner, without polarizing, ad hominem arguments.

Hugh Mann, US Physician on British Medical Journal e-Letters page

This quote (and the others on the page) is the truth behind the hubris most recently in evidence here in Britain in a recent news story about the tragic death of a schoolgirl shortly after she was vaccinated. I was appalled to hear the statements made immediately following this story by doctors who claimed there to be no link whatsoever between the vaccine and the girl’s death. At the time these statements were being made no evidence at all had been accrued to that effect.

Reaction to this story and others can be found on the Alliance for Natural Health site.

Advertisements

October 12, 2009 - Posted by | Quote of the Day | , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: